MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (2024)

MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (1)

MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (2)

  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (3)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (4)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (5)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (6)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (7)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (8)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (9)
  • MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (10)
 

Preview

1 STEVEN C. TOSCHI (SBN 124551) MEREDITH C. DOYLE (SBN 298880) 2 TOSCHI ▪ COLLINS ▪ DOYLE ▪ HOUVENER 5145 Johnson Drive 3 Pleasanton, CA 94588 T: (510) 835-3400 4 F: (510) 835-7800 E: reception@TCDLegal.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant, 6 DALE CRABLE 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ 9 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION10 YVONNE LEANN GRAVIL, ) Case No.: 20CV01017 )11 Plaintiff, ) ) DECLARATION OF STEVEN C.12 v. ) TOSCHI IN SUPPORT OF ) DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO13 DALE CRABLE and DOES 1 through 50, ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. INCLUSIVE, ) 9 TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO14 ) PLAINTIFF’S MARITAL HISTORY Defendants. ) AND HISTORY OF ABSUE AND15 ) TREATMENT OF ABUSE )16 ) Complaint Filed: April 21, 2020 / Trial Date: April 24, 20231718 I, STEVEN C. TOSCHI, declare:19 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all the Courts of the State of20 California, and a partner with the firm of TOSCHI, COLLINS, DOYLE & HOUVENER, APC,21 attorneys of record for Defendant DALE CRABLE (“Defendant”). I have personal knowledge of22 the facts set forth below, and if called upon as a witness at trial, I would and could competently23 testify to the following:24 1. Plaintiff alleged that she had a neck injury from the subject incident. Defendant25 argues that any complaints Plaintiff suffered from were degenerative and not related to the subject26 incidents.27 2. Plaintiff further alleges that she required a total cervical disc replacement at C4-C528 as a result of the subject incident. However, Defendant claims that Plaintiff’s alleged surgery was -1- DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MIL 9 1 not related to the subject incident and also that Plaintiff was not a candidate for the surgery 2 performed by Dr. Sherwin Hua. 3 3. Dr. Kondrashov has opined in his medical record review report dated April 19, 4 2024 that patients with psychosocial comorbidities are at a greater risk for chronic pain syndrome. 5 Further, psychosocial comorbidities important aspect of a patient’s life to consider when 6 determining the efficacy of surgery and whether they are candidates for spine surgery. Attached 7 hereto as EXHIBIT A is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts from Dr. Kondrashov’s 8 deposition transcript. 9 4. Plaintiff is alleging that she experienced worsening psychological conditions10 following the subject incident and is also making claims for pain and suffering from the subject11 incident. Specifically, we expect her to attribute a diminished quality of life and psychological12 complaints to the subject incident. She told Defendant’s retained neuropsychological expert, Dr.13 Friedman, that following the subject incident, she was “sad and angry about what happened to14 her.” She further stated she has nightmares and intrusive thoughts about the subject incident,15 continues to feel angry and scared, continues to experience hypervigilance to danger, has16 depressed mood, and loss of appetite. Dr. Friedman further opined that objective testing did not17 verify the present of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. He also opined that she was exaggerating18 symptoms on objective testing. He said that she is susceptible to depression because she has had19 severe depression in the past. Further, he noted that she did not fully report her past history, which20 indicates she was not forthright with regarding to the extent of her prior depression. Attached21 hereto as EXHIBIT B is a true and correct copy of Dr. Friedman’s report dated March 23, 2022.22 5. Plaintiff’s own retained psychologist Dr. Anthony Reading has testified her sex life23 was affected by her physical and emotional condition, including issues with her self-worth. This24 includes fear of abandonment and trust. Dr. Reading believes that her problems with trust were25 attributed to her former partner Etienne (her ex-husband). Her ability to trust in interpersonal26 relationships reportedly became worse after the accident. Dr. Reading further discussed that27 Plaintiff was depressed before the accident due to an abusive relationship, the fact that her partner28 had been cheating on her, the stress of the separation, financial concerns, significant issues with -2- DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MIL 9 1 her oldest child, and the premature birth of her second child. She acknowledged to Dr. Reading 2 that she would rarely have sex with her husband, which eroded her self-worth. She stated that on 3 one occasion her ex-husband sexually assaulted her. She also described her childhood as traumatic 4 because her father was an alcoholic and a drug addict. The family moved around frequently 5 because of his lifestyle. Her father was verbally abusive and would lock her and her sister in the 6 closet during parties. She reported her husband was abusive to her, and that after their separation, 7 she lost her friends at church. Dr. Reading stated that she has a history of trauma and PTSD arising 8 from a combination of adverse childhood experiences and being raped, which have been activated 9 with the conduct of her husband. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of10 excerpts from Volume I of Dr. Anything Reading’s deposition.11 6. Dr. Anthony Reading, PhD concluded in his February 27, 2023 report that there12 was “clear evidence for a change in Ms. Gravil’s emotional state and function, contingent upon the13 occurrence of the subject accident.” He further concluded her ongoing pain and functional14 limitations from the subject incident, “led to the onset of a depressive disorder, in the form of a15 Major Depressive Disorder, with symptoms of depressed mood, anhedonia, loss of motivation, loss16 of self-worth, irritability, disruption in her sleep and appetite and cognitive changes.” He rated her17 symptoms as moderate to severe. Dr. Reading further opined that the subject incident also18 reactivated prior trauma symptoms from a prior history of trauma symptoms with exposure to19 childhood experiences, domestic abuse, neglect and anal rape as a minor. He stated that the subject20 incident was a significant stressor that set in motion a reactivation of prior trauma disorder in the21 form of PTSD. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Dr. Reading’s February22 27, 2023 report.23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the24 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd day of July 2024, at Pleasanton, California.2526 _________________________________________27 STEVEN C. TOSCHI, ESQ.28 -3- DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MIL 9EXHIBIT A Dimitriy Kondrashov, MD Board Certified Orthopaedic Spine SurgeonApril 19, 2024Steven Toschi, Esq.Toschi Collins Doyle & Houvener5145 Johnson DrivePleasanton, CA 94588 MEDICAL RECORD REVIEWRE: Case Name: Gravil v. Crable Claimant Name: Yvonne Gravil Date of Loss: 11/15/2018Dear Mr. Toschi:I completed a Medical Record Review on claimant Yvonne Gravil.MEDICAL RECORDS REVIEW:Pre-accident records03/22/2011 – Dominican Hospital Emergency Department. Marc Yellin, MD. 38-year-old femalebrought in by family complaining of right thumb, hand pain. Fell back onto it. Fracture of hand,thumb pain. Impression: No acute osseus injury of the right hand.03/23/2011 – Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Bilateral thumb pain. Hand pain. Stress.04/02/2013 – East Cliff Family Health Center. Maria Fuchs, PA-C. Back pain, lower back pain forone week. States was at gym working out, doing squats with 16-pound balls. Pulled muscle in thelower back. Complaining of lower back pain for one week. Was at the gym doing squats, throwingmedicine ball at the wall. Did not catch it correctly. Unable to sit or bend. Was better when layingflat in bed. Pain has been lessening. Chronic pain is 7/10. Unable to do normal daily activities.Denies any new tingling or numbness of lower extremities. Past medical history: Alcohol recovery.Cone biopsy. Asthma. Mild hyperlipidemia. Hives. Suicide attempts as teen. Idiopathic urticaria.Social history: Tobacco use. Former smoker greater than 10 years. Sober for 13 years. Alcohol:Has sponsor. Former smoker. No drugs. Height 63”. Weight 140. Assessment: Lower back pain.Start Flexeril. Start ibuprofen. Continue arnica.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 2 of 3104/03/2013 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Tom Smith DC. LBP. Lumbar sprain/ strain.04/10/2013 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Tom Smith DC.04/24/2013 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Tom Smith DC.10/09/2013 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Flexeril, Ibuprofen. R foot contusion.10/09/2013 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Flexeril, Ibuprofen. Gabapentin.12/18/2013 – East Cliff Family Health Center. Maria Fuchs, PA-C. Follow-up on meds. Discussedways to recognize when she was feeling anxious, angry, and frustrated. Working on not reacting tosituations. Identifying what is actually making her upset, what exact emotion she is experiencing.Even though thinks this is good at time, it can get her into depressive thought process because thinksshe should be feeling this or become analytical about the situation. Patient is feeling less hopelessness.Assessment: Lumbar back pain. Depression. Patient with an acute exacerbation. Saw Tom Smith.Advised patient to revisit for maintenance. Use arnica. Epsom salt bath. Use Flexeril.02/03/2014 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Flexeril, Ibuprofen, Neurontin. Severe depression,02/05/2014 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. DC. LBP. Back spasm. Lumbar sprain. Strain. Muscleache. Lumbar/ thoracic manipulation.04/28/2014 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Ibuprofen, Gabapentin.09/26/2014 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Flexeril, Ibuprofen, Gabapentin.09/29/2014 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Flexeril, Ibuprofen, Gabapentin.10/21/2014 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Recent car accident. Flexeril, Ibuprofen, Gabapentin.03/24/2015 – Watsonville Community Hospital Emergency Department. Presenting complaint: Haveback pain five hours. Was at my Jiujitsu class. Now cannot straighten out completely. Complains ofpain in lumbar area. Pain radiates to right leg, left leg. Pain currently 9/10 on the pain scale. Noted tobe resistant with movement. Reports pain in lumbar area, left lower back, right lower back.Assessment: Reports lower back pain. Radiates posteriorly down both legs to the popliteal area.States legs feel weak. Reports pain after lifting a man in Jiujitsu class.04/29/2015 – East Cliff Family Health Center. X-ray of the chest. Normal chest.07/03/2015 – Doctors on Duty. New sinusitis. Review of systems: Positive for back pain. Positivefor headaches. Positive for anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances. Past medical history: Depression,alcoholism. Family history: Father positive for alcoholism, depression, hyperlipidemia, rheumatoidarthritis, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction. Has a past history of cigarette smoking. Quitdate: 2002. Current medications: Albuterol, bupropion, gabapentin. Assessment: Acute sinusitis.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 3 of 3102/10/2016 – Doctors on Duty. Lee, MD. Recurrent sinusitis. Two or three episodes a year. Duringepisodes, has facial pressure, headache. Reports photophobia, phonophobia, flashes of light. Has beenoffered immunotherapy. Assessment: Allergic rhinitis. Recurrent sinusitis.02/16/2016 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Ibuprofen, Gabapentin. ROS: Neck pain.02/23/2016 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Ibuprofen, Gabapentin.02/29/2016 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Ibuprofen, Gabapentin.02/21/2017 – Watsonville Community Hospital ER. Chest pain, located primarily in the left lowerchest wall one day ago. Pain does not radiate. X-ray: Normal chest.12/02/2017 – Dominican Santa Cruz Hospital Emergency Department. Gregory Whitley, MD. Historyof asthma, shortness of breath. Presents with dyspnea. Admits to headache, neck stiffness, and cough.X-ray of the chest: No acute cardiopulmonary disease. Appears to have acute bronchitis which hasexacerbated her asthma.09/09/2018 – Watsonville Community Hospital Emergency Department. Ear pain, sinus pain, generalweakness. Review of systems positive for dizziness. Impression: Unspecified asthma.Post-accident records11/15/2018 – Watsonville Community Hospital Emergency Department. Complains of auto versuspedestrian. Pedestrian struck by moving vehicle on right elbow. Traveling very low speed. Sustainedright elbow painful injury, swelling, left hip painful injury. Amelioration of pain after being hit by aflower delivery van coming out of a driveway. Tells me the driver apparently did not see her andseemed to be accelerating. She was hit by the front of the van on the right elbow and pushed out onthe street, although she did not fall to the ground. Her right elbow hurt immediately, and then aftersome time her left hip began hurting, although it was not struck, nor did she fall. Does not have anyother complaints at this time. Did not strike her head. No headache, neck pain, back pain, numbness,tingling, or neurological deficits. The elbow is her primary concern. It is tender, mildly swollen,radiating swelling, discomfort into the hand. Blunt trauma. X-ray right elbow: No acuteabnormalities.11/20/2018 – Brennan Medical Clinic (Bayaca, MD). Hospital follow-up. Friday morning patientwalking on the sidewalk. Was hit by a van exiting the driveway. Was hit on the right elbow. Went toER. Had x-rays. Nothing was broken. Patient noted numbness and tingling in her right hand, digits 3to 5. Taking Tylenol or Advil. Patient is not taking it as frequently as prescribed because it irritatesher stomach. Keeping her arm in a sling. Today is the first day she has not really had to use the sling.Needs refill on her inhalers. Patient walks, exercises regularly. Assessment and plan: Pedestrian hitby motor vehicle. Pain in right arm. Asthma.11/21/2018 – Fernando Luque, DC. Chiropractic notes. Complains of right elbow, neck pain, lowback pain.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 4 of 3111/21/2018 – 12/13/2018 – Fernando Luque, DC. Chiropractic notes.12/17/2018 – Justin Lo, MD. Pain management consultation report. Social history: Positive smoking.Social drinking. Denies drug use. Personal assistant. Presents with right elbow pain, neck pain withradiation down her right arm, thoracic back pain with radiation to her abdomen in the T7-9distribution. Complaining of numbness and tingling of her right greater than left arms. Complainingof weakness of her right greater than left arms. Pain is present constantly. Worse with all movements,prolonged position, and all activities, exercise. Subjective complaints: Positive tenderness topalpation. Full range of motion. Spurling test negative. Pain worse in extension, flexion, rotation, andlateral flexion. Positive tenderness to palpation right lateral epicondyle. 5/5 motor strength. Noswelling or atrophy. Back: Positive tenderness to palpation. Full range of motion. Reflexes 2+.Assessment: Cervical radiculopathy. Thoracic radiculopathy. Thoracic strain. Right elbow pain.Start baclofen.12/19/2018 – (Bayaca, MD) Brennan Medical Clinic. Follow-up labs and x-rays. Has been seeingchiropractor twice a week for three weeks. Also had additional x-rays done. Also had TENS andtraction. Will be going to a nerve doctor, Dr. Lo, in San Jose. Patient saw him on Monday. Wasreferred to have an MRI of the neck due to loss of natural curvature of the neck. Assessment and plan:Hyperlipidemia. Cervicalgia. Asthma. Seborrhea.01/02/2019 – MRI of the cervical spine. History of neck pain after being hit by a car while walking.Loss of normal lordotic curvature. Edema interspinous ligamentous C5-6. C3-4 2 mm left paracentraldisc herniation. C4-5 3 mm left foraminal disc herniation. There are osteophytes. Herniated discextends beyond the margins of the osteophytes. Flattening of the left anterior cervical spinal cord.Mild central stenosis. 0.9 cm severe left, mild right, foraminal stenosis. C5-6 2 mm posterior centraldisc herniation. Mild central stenosis. C6-7 2 mm posterior central disc herniation. Herniated discsfrom C3-4 through C6-7. Injury to interspinous ligament, consistent with acute injuries. JosephKavanagh MD.01/02/2019 – MRI of T-spine. Thoracic spine MRI with contrast. Neck pain after being hit by a car.T3-4 posterior central disc herniation demonstrating elevation of posterior longitudinal ligament,effacement of the anterior thecal sac. No osteophytes. Mild central canal stenosis.01/09/2019 – Justin Lo, MD. Consultation report. Social history: Smoking. Social drinking.Stopped chiropractic care as it was making her pain worse. Worst pain is in the neck with bilateralshoulder, right arm radiation. Has been complaining of lower back pain with left posterior legradiation. Happened a few times since stopping chiropractic care. Notes bitemporal headaches whichoccur a couple of times per week and last a few hours. Baclofen helped her sleep. Objective: Neck:Positive tenderness to palpation. Full range of motion. Spurling test negative. Positive tenderness topalpation right lateral epicondyle. 5/5 motor strength. Back: Full range of motion. Pain worsenedwith extension, flexion, rotation, lateral flexion. Reflexes 2+. Assessment: Cervical radiculopathy.Thoracic radiculopathy. Thoracic strain. Right elbow pain. Lumbar radiculopathy. Acceptchiropractic care. DC Motrin. Start diclofenac. Cervical epidural steroid injection next available.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 5 of 3102/06/2019 – Spine & Sports Surgery Center. Operative report. Justin Lo, MD. Preoperativediagnosis: Cervical discogenic pain. Procedure: C7-T1 interlaminar epidural steroid injection underfluoroscopic guidance. C7-T1 epidurogram.02/11/2019 – Brennan Medical Clinic. Francis Bayaca, MD. Growth eyelashes, itchiness, refill. Wasin MVA in November. Had MRI. Noted with multiple cervical disc bulges. Had cortisone injections.Assessed feeling better and still dropping objects at times. Not lifting more than 10 pounds. Takingbaclofen. Also taking NSAID. Does not remember the name. Will also be sent to neurologistregarding dropping of objects.02/20/2019 – Justin Lo, MD. Consultation report. Stopped chiropractic care as it was making her painworse. Status post cervical epidural steroid injection 02/06/2019 with great relief of her pain andnumbness. Assessment: Cervical radiculopathy. Thoracic radiculopathy. Thoracic strain. Rightelbow pain. Lumbar radiculopathy. Had chiropractic care. Continue home exercise program andstretching. Cervical epidural steroid injection in the future. Will send her for PT x12 sessions forreconditioning. Status post epidural steroid injection as her pain has improved dramatically, but shestill feels weakness.03/07/2019 – PT. Select PT. Spine cervicalgia. Patient recently had cortisone injection andchiropractor services increased her pain. Injections seemed to help. Cortisone reduced numbness andtingling. Pain currently 3, worst at 7.03/11/2019 – Select PT. Cervicalgia. Unable to perform workout, running, boxing. Taking musclerelaxer for night. Describes pain as hot, numbness, tingling, electric shock, pain down both arms, bothhands, 3rd and 5th digits. Reported fatigue in neck muscles. Pain has not changed. Patient reportedpain in neck, bilateral shoulders.03/14/2019 – Select PT. Tearful today. Having some depression, anxiety, fear with leaving home dueto she is in pain. Unable to protect herself. She misses working out. Getting depressed. Reported3/10 pain today.03/19/2019 – Central California Neurology. Dale Helman, MD. EMG nerve conduction velocitiesabnormal due to bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.03/19/2019 – Select PT. Increased pain in the afternoon. Feels tired, having to hold her head up.Went to neurologist.03/21/2019 – Select PT. Very tearful, upset this a.m. Crying due to children stating she is no funanymore since the accident. Reports continued pain and discomfort. Given information on homecervical traction unit and home electrical stim unit.03/25/2019 – Select PT. Feeling better, 5/10. Feels like she is getting stronger.03/28/2019 – Select PT. Reported muscle pain today. Pain in her hands. Dropped coffee mug due todropping objects.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 6 of 3104/01/2019 – Justin Lo, MD. Status post epidural steroid injection with great relief of pain andnumbness. PT and home exercise program with improvement of her strength. Still has occasional painin the right scapula with certain movements of her right shoulder. Plan: Chiropractic care did not helpher pain. Continue home exercise program, stretching. Cervical epidural steroid injection in the futureas needed. Continue PT. Start home traction, TENS unit. Return to clinic after she completes PT.Went to see neurologist who did the EMG and nerve conduction studies. Results not available yet.04/01/2019 – PT. Reported no pain at rest. Discomfort with retro bike. Right shoulder blade pain.Mild pain 3-4/10.04/04/2019 – Select PT. Was sore, uncomfortable. She was unable to perform bike. Her pain startedyesterday, has continued. Took a muscle relaxant. Did not help. Reported pinching pain left shoulder,base at the neck region sharp pain.04/08/2019 – PT. Not as flared up as last PT sessions.04/11/2019 – PT. Reported no pain today. Went to Pilates, which went well.04/19/2019 – Central California Neurology, Dale Helman, MD. Personal injury. Physical therapyclearly helping her. Having much less pain, particularly in her cervical spine. Could benefit fromphysical therapy some more. Reviewed MRI. Suspect physical therapy will continue to help.05/30/2019 – Physical therapy. Neck has been feeling better with no pain. Will continue to getoccasional tingling in the right hand.06/05/2019 – Physical therapy. Neck was feeling good after last session. On Saturday daughterattacked her. Twisted her arm, causing slight increase in pain in her right shoulder and neck.06/07/2019 – PT. Pain continues to get better. Had some muscle soreness after the last session.06/10/2019 – Her neck continues to improve. Did her exercise over the weekend.06/12/2019 – Had new muscle soreness after last session. No increase in pain.06/19/2019 – Select PT. Feels that she has made full recovery since start of care. Her neck has nopain. She is able to start getting back into her normal hobbies. Shoulder feeling stronger. No increasein symptoms.06/28/2019 – Central California Neurology. Follow-up appointment. Neurological exam. Follow-upof personal injury. Physical therapy did help. Still very symptomatic on cervical spine. Myimpression is that physical therapy helped. I am more concerned right now about worsening nerveimpingement throughout her spine, as well as nerve entrapment in the extremities. Sort this outobjectively. Need it to be left for diagnostic testing of the upper extremities compared to the one shehad done several months ago. Further recommendations such as pain management. Procedure:Surgical decompression. Will depend on the results. EMG performed. This showed bilateral C6-7radiculopathy, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Dale Helman, MD. Reflexes diminished throughout.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 7 of 31Symmetric sensory. Diminished touch, right C5, C6, C7 distribution, left C6-7 distribution, right L4-S1 distribution, left L5-S1 distribution, bilateral median nerve distribution, bilateral peronealdistribution. Cervical spine spasms diffusely. Lumbar spine spasms diffusely. She had limited rangeof motion to both.07/05/2019 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Going to PT and chiro. Has BUE tingling here andthere. Much improved. Ibuprofen, Neurontin. Current smoker. ROS: musculoskeletal – deniessymptoms.07/20/2019 – MedTrak Diagnostics.07/22/2019 – MedTrak Diagnostics. Proposed care plan.08/05/2019 – Justin Lo, MD. Completed PT with very good relief of pain. Assessment: Sametreatment. Chiropractic care did not help her pain. Continue home exercise program, stretching.Cervical epidural steroid injection in the future as needed. Had PT. Continue with counseling. Starthome traction and TENS unit. Being worked up for memory loss and confusion. Losing totalrecollection of events that have recently passed. Has seen Dr. Helman for neurology evaluation. Herpain is tolerable, status post cervical epidural steroid injection and PT. Will release her from my care.Return to clinic p.r.n.08/19/2019 – Health Diagnostics. MRI of the brain. Travis Snyder, DO, neuroradiologist. Focal areasof abnormal increased flair on T2 signal, involving frontal subcortical white matter. Focal areas ofabnormal signal identified at the right white matter. Interface consistent with sharing diffuse axonalinjury, clinical history of head trauma.08/26/2019, 08/27/2019, 08/28/2019, 08/29/2019, 08/30/2019, 09/03/2/2019, 09/04/2019, 09/05/2019,09/06/2019, 09/09/2019, 09/10/2019, 09/20/2019 – Harpreet Singh, MD. Mind and Body Pain Clinic.Patient presents for rTMS. Chief complaint: Memory loss, headaches, poor balance, dizziness. Beingfollowed at Mind and Body Pain Clinic for management of neurological problems. Assessment andDiagnoses: Major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe, with psychotic symptoms. Memory loss.Traumatic brain injury. Post-concussional syndrome. Posttraumatic stress disorder. Posttraumaticheadache. Procedure: Therapeutic rTMS. Treatment: MRI of the brain without contrast.09/10/2019 – Justin Lo, MD. Completed PT. Continues with home exercise program, stretching.Started to see psychologist who suggested that she is experiencing PTSD. Complaining of nightterrors, sleep paralysis, anxiety, panic attacks, sense of impending doom. Assessment: Cervicalradiculopathy. Thoracic radiculopathy. Thoracic strain. Right elbow pain. Lumbar radiculopathy.PTSD like symptoms. Rule out TBI. Plan: Being worked up for memory loss and confusion. Losingtotal recollection of events that have recently passed. Started to see a psychologist. Has seen Dr.Helman for neurology evaluation. Seen Dr. Singh, neurology, for magnet therapy. Pain is tolerablestatus post cervical epidural steroid injection and PT.09/11/2019 – 10/02/2019 – H. Singh, MD. Mind and Body Pain Clinic. Memory loss, headaches,poor balance, dizziness, presents for rTMS.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 8 of 3110/03/2019 – Justin Lo, MD. Consultation report. Seen Dr. Singh, neurology, for magnet therapy,although her pain is still significantly less than prior to cervical epidural steroid injection, she doeshave some return of her neck pain and tingling and numbness of her arms. Repeat cervical epiduralsteroid injection.10/03/2019, 10/04/2019, 10/07/2019 – Singh, MD. Mind and Body Pain Clinic. Memory loss,headaches, poor balance, dizziness.10/16/2019 – Spine & Sports Surgery Center. Justin Lo, MD. Operative report. Preoperativediagnosis: Cervical discogenic pain. Procedure: C7-T1 interlaminar epidural steroid injection underfluoroscopic guidance. C7-T1 epidurogram. Status post cervical epidural steroid injection 02/06/2019with near 80 to 90% relief of her pain in the neck and arms. Also had resolution of her numbness,tingling of her hands and arms. Pain relief lasted for greater than six months, and then the pain startedto return. Currently pain relief is still 50% improved, compared to before the injection. Numbness andtingling present, intermittently worse. They were present constantly before the injection.11/14/2019 – East Cliff Family Health Center. Referral to neurology. Reported TBI. Brain imagingrequested. Here for breathing treatment for asthma. G-tube being out of control. Does use inhaler.Feels she overuses it. Patient would also like second opinion referral to neuro for past brain injury.Reports she has bulging discs in neck, status post being hit by a car in 2018. Told recently she hasTBI. Went to Mind and Body in Los Gatos, magnetic brain therapy daily for three weeks for a TBI.Seeing LMFT Shawna at PP in Watsonville with new night terrors, now difficulty sleeping, eating.Not sure if stress or TBI. Paranoid thoughts. Does have asthma. Fully controlled allergies.Assessment: Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Seeing LMFT at PP. Mixed obsessional thoughtsand acts.12/13/2019 – Milan Patel, MD. Loss of consciousness, cyst of pineal gland, chronic posttraumaticstress disorder, migraine aura without headache.01/24/2020 – Justin Lo, MD. Status post cervical epidural steroid injection 02/06/2019, 10/16/2019.Still has numbness, tingling, clumsiness of left hand; however, it is happening less than before.Completed PT. Continues with home exercise program, stretching. Also, continues to see apsychologist who suggested that she is experiencing PTSD. Right-sided neck pain with right shoulderradiation. She complains of numbness and tingling of her right arm. Complains of persistentheadache. Assessment: Cervical radiculopathy, thoracic radiculopathy, thoracic strain, right elbowpain, lumbar radiculopathy, PTSD-like symptoms, rule out TBI. Plan: Has had PT. Continue withcounseling. Start home traction. TENS unit. Being worked up for memory loss and confusion.Losing total recollection of events that have recently passed. Also started to see psychologist. It wassuggested she is experiencing PTSD. Has seen Dr. Helman for neurology evaluation. Seeing Dr.Singh. Neurology completed six weeks of magnet therapy which helped depression, cognitivefunction, although derives great benefit, a great relief, status post steroid injection for upward of sixmonths. Her pain does return back to her pre-injection level. Will refer to Dr. Hua for surgicalconsult.01/27/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery, Sherwin Hua, MD. Had right funny bone tingling right afterthe accident. Then after, developed neck pain, back pain, shoulder pain, and also had numbness,RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 9 of 31tingling in the right more than the left. Initially it was on both sides. Also reports dropping things.Has had cortisone shots, which helped temporarily, and then the symptoms returned. Went to achiropractor. It seemed to hurt instead of help, so she stopped going. Instead, she went to PT for along time with success. Then it was not long lasting. Then had cortisone shots. The pain interfereswith her sleep, her ability to sit in church and pray. Used to have migraines before the accident. Nowthe migraines are more intense, more frequent. Has a hard time concentrating, focusing on her prayersand rosary. Also interferes with her sleep. Scrubbing the toilet, position of leaning forward withoutstretched arms very painful. Denies having neck or back pain prior to the accident. Used to run 8miles a day and has five kids. Now her life is much different in terms of activities she can do after theaccident. Diagnoses: Post-concussional syndrome, spondylosis with radiculopathy cervical region,cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy, cervical disc displacement C4-5. Plan of treatment: She hastraumatic brain injury. MRI shows C4-5 traumatic injury to the disc and HNP with cord compression.Has hyperintensity of the STIR MRI of the disc space. Also cord compression from the HNP. Thiscorresponds to the symptoms of neck and shoulder pain, numbness, and dropping things from herhand. She has had this for more than a year. Is a candidate for C4-5 TDR surgery. She also hassymptoms of traumatic brain injury. This will still need further time for recovery.02/20/2020 – Watsonville Community Hospital. Complains of severe sinus pressure with sinussymptoms for greater than 10 days. Now all of her teeth hurt. Maxillary sinuses, particularly the left,are the worst. She is having frontal facial and nasal pressure. Review of systems: Neck negative forinjury, pain, stiffness, or swelling. Neuro positive for dizziness, headache. Negative for numbness,tingling, weakness.02/20/2020 – CT of the head. No CT evidence of acute intracranial pathology. Bilateral maxillary andright ethmoid sinus disease. X-ray of the chest: No acute cardiopulmonary disease.06/30/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Surgery estimate: C3-4, C5-6 total disc replacement.Facility: Spine & Sports Surgery Center. Billing rates: $43,296.60.07/28/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Pain is worse. Now the pain is a littlebetter when she was doing PT. Now the pain is worse down the right arm to the right hand. Has tostretch out right arm and neck every morning for a long time. The only time she is comfortable iswhen she takes muscle relaxant. Does not want to hide her pain by taking medications. In terms ofbrain injury, she said that she is off work, forgetful, loss of confidence of kids and friends. Has lost herfriends. She does not notice things, but her family and friends tell her she just sits around the housemost of the time. Diagnoses: Post-concussional syndrome, spondylosis with radiculopathy cervicalregion, cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy, cervical disc displacement C4-5. Plan of treatment:She is having worse pain. Has C4-5 bilateral foraminal stenosis with disc herniation, disc height loss,interdiscal hyperintensity, consistent with damage of the disc. Failed conservative treatment, includingPT. Still has ability to do basic life activities. Will need to proceed with surgery C4-5 TDR. LastMRI was 18 months ago. She should have another MRI of C-spine to rule out any changes from thefirst MRI and prior to surgery. She should also get a follow up brain MRI as well.08/03/2020 – MRI of C-spine. Indication: Neck pain following motor vehicle collision. Impression:Loss of normal lordotic curvature at C3-4. Left central focal disc herniation C4-5. Left paracentralneural foraminal focal disc herniation superimposed on diffuse bulge, indenting ventral thecal sac,RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 10 of 31elevating posterior longitudinal ligament. Anterior and posterior osteophytes seen. Disc herniationextends posterior to posterior osteophytes. Mild spinal stenosis. C5-6 diffuse disc bulge. Mild spinalstenosis. Mild spinal cord deformity. C6-7 central focal disc herniation elevating posteriorlongitudinal ligament. Avery Knapp, MD. Note compared to prior MRI of cervical spine. Nosignificant interval change is seen.08/05/2020 Santa Cruz Womens Health Center. Preop for surgery.08/14/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. C4-5 TDR procedure note. Spinal Cord Surgery Center.Patient developed significant pain and numbness in the hands and neck after she was hit by a car whilerunning. Failed conservative treatment, including PT and injections. Patient was found to havecervical stenosis from herniated discs C4-5. Patient wished to proceed with surgery. Proceduredetails: Cervical C4-5 total disc arthroplasty.09/08/2020 – East Cliff Family Health Center. Telehealth. Julia Stevens, NP. Has asthma. Wildfires.Moderate persistent asthma. Lungs clear today, improved. Allergic rhinitis. Had back surgery.Recovering well.09/16/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Doing well postop after cervical TDR.Assess fingers. Much less numb. Can control fingers. She says she used to not be able to feel them.Would drop things before surgery. Now things are much better. Has been active. Not back to runningyet.10/20/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Huan, MD. Doing okay. Asking when to restoreprevious intensive activities such as pullups, stretching exercises.10/23/2020 – SimonMed. X-ray C-Spine. Indication: Neck pain. Grade 1 anterolisthesis C5 on C6.Reduced in extension. Mild exaggeration in flexion. Straightening of normal cervical lordosis.11/06/2020 – East Cliff Family Health Center. Julia Stevens, NP. Asthma follow-up. Moderatepersistent asthma. Migraine without status migrainosus. Not intractable. Worse and more frequentsince MVA. Will follow up with neuro.11/11/2020 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Doing okay. Started having neck painwhen she was doing more exercise. Also hears clicking at times. She is afraid she is doing too much.Other times afraid she is not doing enough.11/16/2020 – Milan Patel, MD. Loss of consciousness. Migraine aura without headache. Cyst onpineal gland. Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder.12/03/2020 – Select PT. Cervicalgia, spondylosis without myelopathy, cervical disc degeneration,cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy. Pedestrian struck by car pulling out of a driveway. Began toexperience neck pain, right upper extremity pain, bilateral hand numbness and tingling. Participated inchiropractic, physical therapy, and had cervical injections. Symptoms persisted. Now status postcervical disc replacement surgery, anterior approach. PT. The patient is left-hand dominant. Spinecurrent 5/10. Worst 10/10. Best 0/10. Numbness and tingling bilateral hands reduced after surgery.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 11 of 31Still some numbness and tingling in fingers 2 through 5. Still quite a bit on the thumbs. Numbnessand tingling cause the patient to drop items. Pain location: Bilateral cervical paraspinals, rightparascapular area, generally 4-5/10. Intermittent pain right forearm and hand with activity. Has nopain at times when lying supine, not moving. Morning stiffness. Asthma, allergies, depression, andheadaches. Presentation: Numbness and tingling in both hands. Cervical range of motion limited.Motion extension, left side bend painful. Right upper extremity strength decreased. ADLs limited andpainful. Left leg and recreational activities limited.12/16/2020 – Milan Patel, MD. Loss of consciousness. Cyst on pineal gland. Migraine aura withheadache.12/18/2020 – East Cliff Family Health Center. Julia Stevens, NP. Smoking cessation. Telehealthvisit. Wants nebulizer at home. Social history: Tobacco use. Former smoker. Mild intermittentasthma. Migraine. May want Toradol injection. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding.02/09/2021 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Starting to do some activities now. Usedto swing the bo staff. Now starting to do it again. Feels it helps straighten her shoulders. Notes shedrops the bo staff more than previous to her injury. Had to pause PT due to Covid. Now has learnedexercises. Ready to do it on her own. Still babies her right arm. She has not trusted her right arm tosteer the car steering wheel by itself. She is left-hand dominant. Still notes that the right arm isweaker than it has been versus prior to the accident. For instance, she was massaging her partner. Theright arm started to be numb for the whole night towards the morning. She was still worried how shewould know when some activity is too much as the nerves in her right arm still are not normal. Willbecome numb when she does anything with any force. Feels she can feel the right arm and handnormally. She actually had cut her right hand while grabbing a tool. Did not realize it until she sawblood on it. She is recovering. Still having some weakness, numbness right arm. Overall, better. Willtake more time for further improvement. Follow up in three or four months.04/20/2021 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Doing okay. Has limits because if shelifts too much, then she gets some numbness and tingling in her fingers. She is doing yard work withraking, clearing the yard, picking up sticks and leaves. Does not hurt while she is actually doing it.Plan: Recovering still with some weakness. Will need x-ray flexion, extension of C-spine for nexttime.08/24/2021 – Central California Neurology. Dale Helman, MD. Neurological exam. Saw this patienttoday for reevaluation up to two years for her personal injury. She did undergo what sounds to be asuccessful surgery on her cervical spine. Very recently she has been getting a lot more pain symptomsin her upper extremities. There have been no new events such as another injury to account for this.Full motor exam: Symmetric with no focal atrophy or involuntary movement. Reflexes diminished atthe biceps at both sides. Sensory diminished in bilateral C6-7 distribution and bilateral median nervedistribution. Gait was unremarkable. No ataxia or incoordination. Cervical spine spasm diffuselywith some limited range of motion. Assessment: Somewhat concerning. She seems to havedeteriorated somewhat. Plans to get an updated MRI of her cervical spine and electrodiagnostic testing.Further recommendations such as physical therapy or even more aggressive measures will depend onthe above. EMG electromyography showed bilateral C6-7 radiculopathy, bilateral carpal tunnelsyndrome.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 12 of 3109/28/2021 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Says she has gotten better. Still hasnumbness in her right more than left arms and hands. Index and middle finger affected most. Returnswith flexion and extension x-rays. She had full flexion and extension. X-ray of C-spine shows stablemovement in flexion and extension compared with October 2020. Having continued symptoms ofnumbness because she cannot have MRI of C-spine due to artifact generated right cervical lymph node.Plan: Will need CT myelogram to see if there is buildup of PLL and nerve impingement in the area ofsurgery.09/28/2021 – X-ray C-spine. Indication: Pain. Impression: Intact surgical hardware at C4-5.Moderate degenerative spondylosis. Jennifer Lin, MD.01/21/2022 – Central California Neurology. Dale Helman, MD. Getting more symptoms in the cervicalspine and extremities more numbness. She has also had the same cognitive deficits. Very frustratedabout this. Full motor exam symmetric. No focal atrophy. Reflexes diminished at biceps, triceps,both sides. Sensory diminished touch right C5, C6, C7 distribution, left C6, C7, C8 distribution,bilateral median nerve distribution. Gait unremarkable. Cervical spine spasm diffusely with verylimited range of motion. Assessment/Impression: She is certainly no better. May be deteriorating alot again. She does have evidence of worsening nerve impingement in her cervical spine. Also,worsening nerve entrapment. Electrodiagnostic testing shows bilateral C6-7 radiculopathy, moderate tosevere bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.02/10/2022 – SimonMed Imaging. Brain MRI. Post-concussion syndrome. Impression: Negativecontrast-enhanced brain MRI. No acute infarction, intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial mass lesion.Mucosal thickening, right maxillary sinus.03/28/2022 – Central California Neurology. Follow-up appointment. Dale Helman, MD. Neurologicalexam. Reevaluation of personal injury. Fortunately, MRI of her head was normal. She was veryhappy to hear this. Unfortunately, she is still getting severe pain in the cervical spine and surroundingarea despite being diligent with her home therapy program. Denies any new focal motor deficits ordecrease in cognitive status. Assessment: Somewhat concerned that her nerve impingementsymptoms are certainly not improving and possibly getting worse as well as possible traumaticneuropathy in upper extremities. These are serious conditions. Electrodiagnostic testing performed onthis patient showed bilateral C6-7 radiculopathy.04/15/2022 – Advantage Neurology. Fred Samimi, MD, neurologist, acupuncturist. Presents withchief complaint of headache, neck pain, bilateral shoulder pain, thoracic back pain, elbow pain, headnumbness, insomnia, anxiety, muscle spasms, forgetfulness, ringing in the ears. Neck spasm and painintensity 8/10, taking ibuprofen 600 mg twice daily as needed. Headache four times a week, intensity10/10. Pain in both shoulders, right elbow 5/10. Nonsmoker. Nondrinker. Single with five children.Review of systems: Insomnia, depression, anxiety, memory lapse, word finding difficulty, nightmares.Examination: Spasm in trapezius, paracervical region, low back. Assessment: Status post MVA,cervicalgia, cervical strain, headache, concussion, post-concussive syndrome, mild traumatic braininjury, lumbar strain, low back pain, muscle spasm, lumbar radiculopathy, occipital neuralgia.Telemedicine. Was struck by vehicle, had a head impact leading to loss of consciousness. She willobtain brain MRI with DTI (diffusion tensor imaging). Cervical MRI without contrast is indicated dueRE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 13 of 31to neck pain involvement. Continue physiotherapy, chiropractic care. She will perform Folsteinmedical examination after imaging.06/07/2022 – Brain MRI with DTI. Impression: A few scattered white matter signal foci. Differentialdiagnosis includes post-traumatic gliosis, chronic small vessel ischemic hypertensive changes orvasospastic phenomenon associated with chronic migraine headaches. I do not see specific evidence tosuggest demyelination. Brain parenchyma is otherwise unremarkable. No cerebral volume loss.Abnormal susceptibility weighted imaging with a focus of hemosiderin in the subcortical left temporallobe. Abnormal significantly decreased fractional anisotropy can be seen in the setting of mildtraumatic axonal injury. Darren Buono, MD.06/18/2022 – Advantage Neurology. Fred Samimi, MD. Follow-up. Presenting with symptoms ofheadache, shoulder pain, low back pain. Pain in the neck 7/10. Taking ibuprofen as needed. Pain inright shoulder, right elbow 10/10. Telemedicine/telehealth. Appears depressed, anxious.Experiencing extreme daily headache, for which she is requiring prophylaxis. Completing brain MRIDTI. Like to obtain neuropsychological testing.08/22/2022 – Precision Occupational Medical Group. Sanjay Deshmukh, MD. Sustained multipleinjuries when struck by a car. Status post cervical spine surgery. Complains of persistent neck painthat radiates to right upper extremity with numbness and tingling in the hands. Here for EMG of upperextremities. Exam: C-spine decreased range of motion. Tenderness to palpation paraspinals,trapezius. Healed anterior incision. Motor grossly 5-/5 bilateral upper extremities. Sensation grosslyintact bilateral upper extremities. Diagnosis: Neuralgia. Nerve conduction study bilateral upperextremities. Abnormal EMG with findings of mild right C6 radiculopathy. Normal nerve conductionstudies of upper extremities.11/23/2022 – DimeSpine Neurosurgery. Sherwin Hua, MD. Has more numbness of fingers and toes.Still experiences shooting pain through her arms when reaching her hands out to the side. Unable todo manicures because of the position of bending her head down to do her nails. Recently startedexperiencing ice cold sensation across the top of her head. Continues to have confusion, memorylapse, verbal and mental disorientation since the accident. Assessment: Post-concussional syndrome,spondylosis with radiculopathy cervical region, cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy, cervical discdisplacement C4-C5 level. Continues to experience cervical radiculopathy. Has not gotten CTmyelogram of C-spine yet. Will need the study to properly evaluate for potential progressive stenosisat TDR level. On MRI, the presence of Prodisc implant generates too much artifact. Will also need toretrieve records of her EMG/nerve conduction studies of both arms. Will refer her to Dr. Ibrahimi,TBI specialist, for further evaluation. Will reorder CT myelogram of C-spine.01/02/2023 – Advantage Neurology. Fred Samimi, MD, neurologist. Photophobia and headache.Pain in the mid back between shoulder blades, right shoulder, both shoulders, right hand, left hand,both wrists. Toes feeling tingly. 6/10. No medicine taken. Telemedicine. Assessment: Lumbarstrain, low back pain, muscle spasm, status post MVA, cervicalgia, cervical sprain, lumbarradiculopathy, headache, concussion with loss of consciousness, post-concussive syndrome, anxiety,mild cognitive impairment, vertigo.RE: Yvonne GravilApril 19, 2024Page 14 of 3101/23/2023 – Alireza Bagherian, DC. Functional capacity evaluation summary. Job title: Personalassistant.02/06/2023 – Mobin Neurosurgery. Fardad Mobin, MD, neurosurgeon. Neurosurgical evaluation.Chief complaint: Constant neck pain with radiation to bilateral extremities, right greater than left,constant weakness, tingling, numbness in bilateral lower extremities, constant mid back pain,intermittent pain in bilateral feet and toes, headaches, PTSD, limited range of motion. 50-year-old,left-hand dominant woman, status

Related Contentin Santa Cruz County

Case

Maria Ortiz Hernandez vs Enedino Nino Leon

Jul 10, 2024 |Connolly, Rebecca |Dissolution w/o Minor Children |24FL00721

Case

Jeff Walther, et al vs Jose Negrete

Jul 12, 2024 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(22) Unlimited Auto |24CV01977

Case

Beatris Vasquez vs Tomatero Organic Farm

Jul 12, 2024 |Schmal, Timothy |(15) Unlimited Other Employment |24CV01981

Case

Matter of Donald Robert

Jul 10, 2024 |Schmal, Timothy |(43) Name / Gender Change |24CV01955

Case

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs Zachary Vavoulis

Jul 12, 2024 |Schmal, Timothy |(09) Limited Other Collections: Under 10,000 |24CV01982

Case

Johanna Carrillo-Nava vs Luis Palmerin Martinez

Jul 11, 2024 |Connolly, Rebecca |Dissolution w/ Minor Children |24FL00733

Case

Matter of Jocelyn Lozano

Jul 08, 2024 |Schmal, Timothy |(43) Name / Gender Change |24CV01945

Ruling

JOHN ROE 1, et al vs Mountain View Whisman School District, et al

Jul 11, 2024 |22CV02834

22CV02834JOHN ROE 1 et al. v. MOUNTAIN VIEW WHISMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. SANTA CRUZ CITY SCHOOL’S MOTION FOR STAY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO CONTINUE TRIAL SANTA CRUZ CITY SCHOOL’S MOTION TO COMPEL MENTAL EXAMINATION AND TESTING OF PLAINTIFF ROE 3 AND PLAINTIFF ROE 4 The motion to continue trial is denied. The motion to compel is granted. Motion to continue trial While Dr. Scott has another trial appearance slated for early October 2024, the partiesand trial court can fashion a witness schedule to accommodate his other trial and conferencecommitments. Motion to compel mental exam and testing of plaintiffs Page 1 of 4 The parties are unable to reach an agreement as to the length of time which should bepermitted for evaluation by psychiatrist Dr. Charles Scott. Plaintiffs assert a total of 8 hours perplaintiff is sufficient for examinations by both Drs. Hooker and Scott. Defendant contends Dr.Scott requires up to 8 hours of testing and Dr. Hooker requires up to 4 hours of testing. Insupport of this position, Dr. Scott provided a declaration explaining why up to 8 hours isrequired. Having reviewed his declaration, the court finds it sufficient to establish good cause tocompel examination and testing of Roes 3 and 4 with Dr. Scott for up to 8 hours and for up to 4hours with Dr. Hooker. That is, a total of 12 hours for each plaintiff. (Code of Civ. Proc. §2032.320, subd. (a).) Plaintiffs also assert they do not want to sign the document titled“Informational/Agreement For Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation” from UC Davis Health, Schoolof Medicine before Dr. Scott’s evaluation, because it “may cause them to waive certainfundamental rights.” (Opp at pg. 7.) A copy of the form is attached to Dr. Scott’s declaration asexhibit C-2. The court reviewed the form and did not find it contained any waivers except thedoctor-patient relationship and the duty of confidentiality that accompanies the relationship,which is expected given the context of the evaluation. Plaintiffs did raise any specific issues withthe form, so the court is unable to further address their concerns regarding this form. Defendant SCCS’s Request for Judicial Notice: Defendants request for the court take judicial notice of the first amended complaint andcertificates of merit for Defendant Does 1 and 2 are denied since the court need not take judicialnotice of records in its own file. Defendants SCCC’s Second Request for Judicial Notice 1. Court order in Doe v. Familiesfirst Inc. 2018 Cal.Super. LEXIS 36211. Denied. Trial court orders have no precedential value. (Bolanos v. Sup. Ct. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 744, 761.) 2. Court order in Jaber v. Cal. Envtl. Sys., 2018 Cal.Super. LEXIS 61456. Denied. Trial court orders have no precedential value. (Bolanos v. Sup. Ct. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 744, 761.) 3. Court order in Aguilar v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles 2021 Cal.Super. LEXIS 42435. Denied. Trial court orders have no precedential value. (Bolanos v. Sup. Ct. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 744, 761.) 4. Order on defendants SCCS’s Motion to Stay Proceedings in the Alternative, to Continue Trial Date, dated May 15, 2025. Denied. The court need not take judicial notice of its own court records. Page 2 of 4 5. Oral Argument Notice from Court of Appeal First Appellate District dated June 25, 2024, appellate case no. A169314. Granted. 6. Temporary Stay Order from Court of Appeal Second Appellate District filed June 26, 2024, appellate case no. B334707. Granted.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

Jul 12, 2024 |23CV02864

23CV02864KELLEY v. R.C. BENSON & SONS INC. (UNOPPOSED) MOTION TO INTERVENE County of Santa Cruz’s motion for leave to intervene is granted. Although the Countyfailed to attach the proposed complaint in intervention as required under Code of Civil Proceduresection 387, subdivision (c), the Court waives that defect. The complaint in intervention shall befiled within 14 days of the hearing.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

Eric Amadei vs Timothy Morgan, ESQ, et al

Jul 12, 2024 |23CV00719

23CV00719AMADEI v. MORGAN (UNOPPOSED) MOTION TO DEEM THE TRUTH OF MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS The unopposed motion is granted. Plaintiff seeks an order deeming the truth of all matters specified in his requests foradmissions, set one, propounded on defendant Morgan. Plaintiff also seeks monetary sanctions inthe amount of $2,145.00. I. Legal Authority Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280, subdivision (b), if a party fails toserve a timely response to requests for admission, the requesting party may move for an orderthat the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matter specified in the request bedeemed admitted, as well as for monetary sanctions. Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280, subdivision (c) requires the court to make thisorder “unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed hasserved, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission thatis in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220. It is mandatory that the court impose amonetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) on the party orattorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to requests for admission necessitatedthis motion.” II. Discussion Page 2 of 3 Pursuant to the Discovery Act, the court shall order the requests for admission asadmitted unless code-compliant responses are served before the hearing. (Code of Civ. Proc. §2033.280, subd. (c).) Plaintiff served requests for admissions, set one on April 5, 2024, via electronic service,on defendant. (Ex. 2 to Dec. of U. Singh.) Defendant failed to respond to the requests and has notcommunicated with plaintiff’s counsel regarding the requests. (Dec. of U. Singh at ¶ 8.) The court deems admitted all matters specified in requests for admissions, set one,attached to the Declaration of Mr. Singh as Ex. 2. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280, subd. (b).) Thiswill be the order of the court unless defendant serves, before the hearing on the motion, aproposed response to the requests for admissions that is in substantial compliance with Code ofCivil Procedure section 2033.220. The court imposes monetary sanctions against defendant Morgan in the amount of$1,195.00, payable no later than July 31, 2024.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

Luis Kutz, et al vs Jennifer Fribourgh, et al

Jul 10, 2024 |23CV01711

23CV01711KUTZ et al. v. FRIBOURGH et al. (UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO BE RELIEVED The unopposed motions are denied without prejudice. Counsel must refile to reflectcorrect upcoming hearing dates in the declarations and proposed orders.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed. Page 1 of 1

Ruling

H. N. vs Scotts Valley Unified School District, et al

Jul 10, 2024 |22CV01828

22CV01828H.N. v. SCOTTS VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATIONSUMMARY OF RULING: Defendants’ motion for summary judgment/adjudication is granted on the grounds thatdefendants District, Krause and Wahl have established a complete defense to the action sincethey are immune pursuant to Government Code §§ 820.2, 815.2, and 855.4. The motion is granted as to defendant Gelter since plaintiff’s evidence fails to establishshe is liable for false imprisonment, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, anyBane Act violation, or civil rights violations. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a minor who was enrolled in first grade at Brook Knoll Elementary School in2022. Through his parental guardian he alleges a variety of harm, all related to actions by schoolemployees related to COVID-19 protocols and their impact on him. His causes of action are falseimprisonment, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violations of Civil Code§52 (Bane Act), and civil rights violations (First and Fourteenth Amendments of the USConstitution; Cal. Constitution, Art. I, section 2(a); and Education Code § 48907(a)). Defendants Scotts Valley Unified School District (“District”), Tanya Krause(superintendent), Joshua Wahl (principal), and Meghann Gelter (teacher) move for summaryjudgment or summary adjudication on the grounds they are immune from liability based uponGovernment Code §§ 820.2, 855.4, 818.2, and 820.4; that no false imprisonment occurred due toH.N.’s parental consent; negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress fail since theDistrict’s and its employees’ measures were within a school’s customary supervisory duties andwere reasonable; and the Bane Act and civil rights claims fail since plaintiff had noconstitutional right to enter school unmasked or without participating in COVID-19 testing,defendants’ measures were reasonable, and the District is permitted to exclude students whor*fuse to comply with public health and safety measures related to communicable disease.1 Plaintiff’s allegations deal with the school’s implementation of COVID-19 protocolsrelated to his unvaccinated status and refusal to test over a two-month period in early 2022 –such as requiring him to remain home for 10 days despite no exposure, allegedly berating him to1 An additional defendant, Nadia Oskolkoff (Director of Student Services), was not included in defendants’ answerto the FAC and there is no default or dismissal in the court record. Defendants fail to mention her in their briefingand plaintiff identifies her only in his Bane Act claim arguing she called the police on him. (Opp. at 14.) Page 2 of 18wear a mask outdoors at recess, sequestering him from his peers with a 1:1 aide (even when heearned Student of the Week), sending him to the nurse when he refused to use hand sanitizer andasked to wash his hands instead, sending him to the principal’s office when he refused to wear amask (nearly every day), taking him aside and telling him not to discuss his family’s decisions infront of his peers, refusing to allow him to hold a sign at recess he made that said, “END THISNONSENSE,” and accusing him of disrupting class. (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶¶14-59) II. MOTION A. Moving papers Defendants’ motion is based primarily on applicable governmental immunities: • Government Code §§ 820.2, 815.22 – public employees immune for discretionary acts, and where a public employee is immune, the entity is as well. Defendants argue that all of their acts dealing with plaintiff and his unvaccinated status and refusal to mask or stay home required the exercise of discretion (making a conscious policy decision, balancing risks and advantages). (UMF 3, 4.) • § 855.4 – decisions to perform or not to perform acts promoting public health by preventing disease that is the result of discretion vested with the public entity; the district and its staff’s decisions as to how to protect plaintiff’s, and others’, health and provide plaintiff instruction when he refused to vaccinate, mask or stay home. (UMF 6, 7.) • § 818.2 – public entity not liable for adopting or failing to adopt an enactment or failing to enforce any law; here, the adoption of the Cal. Dept. of Public Health’s (“CDPH”) masking and quarantining policies for schools. (UMF 9, 10.) • § 820.4, Education Code § 44805 – immunity for acts or omissions, exercising due care, in the execution or enforcement of any law; district’s and staff’s enforcement of CDPH’s mandates and district policies and protocols for testing, masking and quarantining. (UMF 12-15.) As for false imprisonment (first cause of action), the district argues none of its conduct inseparating plaintiff from his classmates in the principal’s office or an unused classroom wasunlawful and therefore this claim fails. Since the district is required to supervise students at alltimes and to enforce rules and regulations for their protection, and students are required to be intheir classroom participating in a non-disruptive manner, defendants argue that their acts to2 All future statutory references are to the Government Code, unless otherwise stated. Page 3 of 18separate plaintiff and provide him instruction apart from his classmates was lawful. (UMF 17-24.) Defendants contend negligence (second cause of action) also fails since there is noevidence they breached their duty in supervising plaintiff while he was on school grounds. Theyexercised reasonable care in plaintiff’s supervision and did not breach their standard of care,which is that of a person of ordinary prudence, charged with comparable duties. (Hoyem v.Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 508, 513; C.A. v. Wm. S. Hart Union HighSch. Dist. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 861, 869.) While he was separated from others, defendantsaccommodated him by giving him a one-on-one substitute, schoolwork to complete, breaks,recess, and the ability to participate in his student of the week award presentation (conductedoutside). (UMF 25-29.) The intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) claim (third cause of action)allegedly fails since there is no evidence that defendants acted with extreme and outrageousconduct with the intention of causing emotional distress or realization that harm would result.Instead, they accommodated plaintiff’s refusal to comply with the COVID-19 protocols while hewas at school. (UMF 30-32.) Defendants argue the Bane Act claim (fourth cause of action) fails because there is noevidence that by threats or coercion, defendants intended to deprive plaintiff of his rights securedby federal or state law. They argue plaintiff’s conduct was not protected free speech since hisand his parents’ conduct were unquestionably disruptive to the orderly operation of the school, inviolation of Education Code § 48907. They contend plaintiff did not have any right to defy theCOVID-19 protocols and remain in school with his classmates. Further, plaintiff did not believeany defendant would commit violence against him and no defendant threatened or committedviolence against him. Even if plaintiff and his parents were offended by the COVID-19 protocolsand resulting measures to protect plaintiff and others, courts permit the exclusion of studentswho refuse to comply with public health and safety measures designed to prevent the spread ofcommunicable disease. (Love v. State Dept. of Education (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 980, 990; Brownv. Smith (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 1135, 1146.) (UMFs 33-36.) The civil rights violations alleged in the fifth cause of action must fail, defendants argue,because they were required to comply with and enforce the CDPH school mandates, and thosemandates were lawfully adopted via the governor’s emergency executive orders. (640 Tenth LPv. Newsom (2022) 78 Cal.App.5th 840, 855.) Defendants complied with those mandates and theirobligation to provide an alternative educational setting to plaintiff when he refused to complywith them. There is no evidence their actions constituted civil rights violations. (UMF 37-39.) B. Opposition Page 4 of 18 Plaintiff argues there are disputed material facts related to all his causes of action. Healleges defendants would not allow him on campus despite him not being sick and not needing toquarantine, and choosing to not use masks, tests or vaccines. In response to these choices,plaintiff says he was “punished, humiliated, ostracized, falsely imprisoned, and bullied byeducators,” that he was emotionally traumatized and requires therapy, and that he no longertrusts adults. He goes on to argue that defendants weaponized local government agencies – localpolice, the county superintendent, and president of the school board – against him and his family.He contends that his father’s interaction with a local police officer during a traffic stop, thecounty superintendent’s offer to involve the police regarding the family’s disruptive behavior,and the board member’s consideration of making a CPS report, support his weaponizationtheory. He argues immunity does not apply because defendants merely regurgitated CDPHprotocols and did not actually make any policy decisions; that defendants’ acts have nothing todo with public health but are instead tortious conduct; that they do not enjoy immunity for theiradoption of the enactment (CDPH mandates) since they are not law enforcement and there wasno “law” to enforce; and they were not exercising due care in the execution of a law since therewas no “law.” Plaintiff insists neither he nor his parents consented to his confinement and separationfrom his classmates, so his false imprisonment claim survives. He argues there are disputedmaterial facts as to whether defendants had any lawful privilege to separate plaintiff. Hecontends that defendants breached their duty to him in failing to use ordinary care by segregatingand discrimination against him, that there is evidence defendants’ conduct was extreme andoutrageous, and that threats of violence are not required to establish a Bane Act claim. Plaintiffthen argues that defendants punitively enforced the COVID-19 recommendations, which werenot approved through any due process requirements of the APA and had no force and effect oflaw. C. Reply On reply, defendants restate their arguments on immunity and clarify that discretionaryacts are those that require personal deliberation, decision and judgment and not merely theperformance of an act in which the actor is left without choice. (Johnson v. State of California(1968) 69 Cal.2d 782, 788.) Defendants argue they were faced with decision-making whenplaintiff refused to wear a mask, and that the CDPH mandates did not actually describe specificactions for how to respond to students who failed to comply. (Defendants’ RJN nos. 5-7.)Instead, district employees were left to figure out how to respond and how to accommodate usingtheir judgment. They argue these judgments and decisions were based on the goal of protectingthe school community by reducing the risk of threat of contagious and infection disease, thereby Page 5 of 18invoking immunity under § 855.4. (See Schmidt v. City of Pasadena (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024,

Ruling

JOHN ROE 1, et al vs Mountain View Whisman School District, et al

Jul 10, 2024 |22CV02834

22CV02834JOHN ROE 1 et al. v. MOUNTAIN VIEW WHISMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. SANTA CRUZ CITY SCHOOL’S MOTION FOR STAY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO CONTINUE TRIAL SANTA CRUZ CITY SCHOOL’S MOTION TO COMPEL MENTAL EXAMINATION AND TESTING OF PLAINTIFF ROE 3 AND PLAINTIFF ROE 4 The motion to continue trial is denied. The motion to compel is granted. Motion to continue trial While Dr. Scott has another trial appearance slated for early October 2024, the partiesand trial court can fashion a witness schedule to accommodate his other trial and conferencecommitments. Motion to compel mental exam and testing of plaintiffs Page 1 of 4 The parties are unable to reach an agreement as to the length of time which should bepermitted for evaluation by psychiatrist Dr. Charles Scott. Plaintiffs assert a total of 8 hours perplaintiff is sufficient for examinations by both Drs. Hooker and Scott. Defendant contends Dr.Scott requires up to 8 hours of testing and Dr. Hooker requires up to 4 hours of testing. Insupport of this position, Dr. Scott provided a declaration explaining why up to 8 hours isrequired. Having reviewed his declaration, the court finds it sufficient to establish good cause tocompel examination and testing of Roes 3 and 4 with Dr. Scott for up to 8 hours and for up to 4hours with Dr. Hooker. That is, a total of 12 hours for each plaintiff. (Code of Civ. Proc. §2032.320, subd. (a).) Plaintiffs also assert they do not want to sign the document titled“Informational/Agreement For Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation” from UC Davis Health, Schoolof Medicine before Dr. Scott’s evaluation, because it “may cause them to waive certainfundamental rights.” (Opp at pg. 7.) A copy of the form is attached to Dr. Scott’s declaration asexhibit C-2. The court reviewed the form and did not find it contained any waivers except thedoctor-patient relationship and the duty of confidentiality that accompanies the relationship,which is expected given the context of the evaluation. Plaintiffs did raise any specific issues withthe form, so the court is unable to further address their concerns regarding this form. Defendant SCCS’s Request for Judicial Notice: Defendants request for the court take judicial notice of the first amended complaint andcertificates of merit for Defendant Does 1 and 2 are denied since the court need not take judicialnotice of records in its own file. Defendants SCCC’s Second Request for Judicial Notice 1. Court order in Doe v. Familiesfirst Inc. 2018 Cal.Super. LEXIS 36211. Denied. Trial court orders have no precedential value. (Bolanos v. Sup. Ct. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 744, 761.) 2. Court order in Jaber v. Cal. Envtl. Sys., 2018 Cal.Super. LEXIS 61456. Denied. Trial court orders have no precedential value. (Bolanos v. Sup. Ct. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 744, 761.) 3. Court order in Aguilar v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles 2021 Cal.Super. LEXIS 42435. Denied. Trial court orders have no precedential value. (Bolanos v. Sup. Ct. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 744, 761.) 4. Order on defendants SCCS’s Motion to Stay Proceedings in the Alternative, to Continue Trial Date, dated May 15, 2025. Denied. The court need not take judicial notice of its own court records. Page 2 of 4 5. Oral Argument Notice from Court of Appeal First Appellate District dated June 25, 2024, appellate case no. A169314. Granted. 6. Temporary Stay Order from Court of Appeal Second Appellate District filed June 26, 2024, appellate case no. B334707. Granted.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

Eric Amadei vs Timothy Morgan, ESQ, et al

Jul 11, 2024 |23CV00719

23CV00719AMADEI v. MORGAN (UNOPPOSED) MOTION TO DEEM THE TRUTH OF MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS The unopposed motion is granted. Plaintiff seeks an order deeming the truth of all matters specified in his requests foradmissions, set one, propounded on defendant Morgan. Plaintiff also seeks monetary sanctions inthe amount of $2,145.00. I. Legal Authority Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280, subdivision (b), if a party fails toserve a timely response to requests for admission, the requesting party may move for an orderthat the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matter specified in the request bedeemed admitted, as well as for monetary sanctions. Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280, subdivision (c) requires the court to make thisorder “unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed hasserved, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission thatis in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220. It is mandatory that the court impose amonetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) on the party orattorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to requests for admission necessitatedthis motion.” II. Discussion Page 2 of 3 Pursuant to the Discovery Act, the court shall order the requests for admission asadmitted unless code-compliant responses are served before the hearing. (Code of Civ. Proc. §2033.280, subd. (c).) Plaintiff served requests for admissions, set one on April 5, 2024, via electronic service,on defendant. (Ex. 2 to Dec. of U. Singh.) Defendant failed to respond to the requests and has notcommunicated with plaintiff’s counsel regarding the requests. (Dec. of U. Singh at ¶ 8.) The court deems admitted all matters specified in requests for admissions, set one,attached to the Declaration of Mr. Singh as Ex. 2. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280, subd. (b).) Thiswill be the order of the court unless defendant serves, before the hearing on the motion, aproposed response to the requests for admissions that is in substantial compliance with Code ofCivil Procedure section 2033.220. The court imposes monetary sanctions against defendant Morgan in the amount of$1,195.00, payable no later than July 31, 2024.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

Jul 10, 2024 |23CV02864

23CV02864KELLEY v. R.C. BENSON & SONS INC. (UNOPPOSED) MOTION TO INTERVENE County of Santa Cruz’s motion for leave to intervene is granted. Although the Countyfailed to attach the proposed complaint in intervention as required under Code of Civil Proceduresection 387, subdivision (c), the Court waives that defect. The complaint in intervention shall befiled within 14 days of the hearing.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

Darrin Hoover vs Christina Shepherd

Jul 10, 2024 |23CV02997

23CV02997HOOVER v. SHEPHERD (UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF HOOVER’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED The unopposed motion to be relieved is granted.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed. Page 1 of 1

Document

Ashliegh LaFaver vs Angelique Millhouse, et al

Jan 13, 2021 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |21CV00080

Document

Ryan Smith vs Future Motion, Inc., et al

May 24, 2021 |Schmal, Timothy |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |21CV01320

Document

Tyler Bradshaw vs Future Motion, Inc.

Feb 28, 2022 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |22CV00423

Document

YVONNE GRAVIL vs DALE CRABLE

Apr 21, 2020 |Schmal, Timothy |(22) Unlimited Auto |20CV01017

Document

Van Ly vs Santa Cruz Seaside Company

Jun 19, 2024 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |24CV01784

Document

Spencer Bringhurst vs Future Motion, Inc.

Dec 28, 2021 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |21CV03080

Document

Jonathan Van Wickle vs Future Motion, Inc.

Sep 15, 2022 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |22CV01985

Document

Evelyn Cushing vs Future Motion, Inc.

Sep 23, 2022 |Cogliati, Syda Kosofsky |(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD |22CV02069

MIL 9 SCT Dec July 03, 2024 (2024)

References

Top Articles
Anatomy Drawing Lessons
Editorial Roundup: United States
Spasa Parish
Rentals for rent in Maastricht
159R Bus Schedule Pdf
Sallisaw Bin Store
Black Adam Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Delano
Espn Transfer Portal Basketball
Pollen Levels Richmond
11 Best Sites Like The Chive For Funny Pictures and Memes
Things to do in Wichita Falls on weekends 12-15 September
Craigslist Pets Huntsville Alabama
Paulette Goddard | American Actress, Modern Times, Charlie Chaplin
Red Dead Redemption 2 Legendary Fish Locations Guide (“A Fisher of Fish”)
What's the Difference Between Halal and Haram Meat & Food?
R/Skinwalker
Rugged Gentleman Barber Shop Martinsburg Wv
Jennifer Lenzini Leaving Ktiv
Justified - Streams, Episodenguide und News zur Serie
Epay. Medstarhealth.org
Olde Kegg Bar & Grill Portage Menu
Cubilabras
Half Inning In Which The Home Team Bats Crossword
Amazing Lash Bay Colony
Juego Friv Poki
Dirt Devil Ud70181 Parts Diagram
Truist Bank Open Saturday
Water Leaks in Your Car When It Rains? Common Causes & Fixes
What’s Closing at Disney World? A Complete Guide
New from Simply So Good - Cherry Apricot Slab Pie
Drys Pharmacy
Ohio State Football Wiki
Find Words Containing Specific Letters | WordFinder®
FirstLight Power to Acquire Leading Canadian Renewable Operator and Developer Hydromega Services Inc. - FirstLight
Webmail.unt.edu
2024-25 ITH Season Preview: USC Trojans
Navy Qrs Supervisor Answers
Trade Chart Dave Richard
Lincoln Financial Field Section 110
Free Stuff Craigslist Roanoke Va
Wi Dept Of Regulation & Licensing
Pick N Pull Near Me [Locator Map + Guide + FAQ]
Crystal Westbrooks Nipple
Ice Hockey Dboard
Über 60 Prozent Rabatt auf E-Bikes: Aldi reduziert sämtliche Pedelecs stark im Preis - nur noch für kurze Zeit
Wie blocke ich einen Bot aus Boardman/USA - sellerforum.de
Infinity Pool Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Bakersfield
Dermpathdiagnostics Com Pay Invoice
How To Use Price Chopper Points At Quiktrip
Maria Butina Bikini
Busted Newspaper Zapata Tx
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 5952

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.